The more discussion the better.
Sorry for the confusion, hopefully I can clear that up for you here.

Governor Jan Brewer signed an immigration law that launched a national debate.
Obama and his regime govern against the will of the people. CBS Poll: 60 percent of Americans say Arizona’s tough new immigration law is “about right” or “doesn’t go far enough.” Are you listening, Washington?

In this comment I am actually beginning the conversation about the new Law passed in Arizona. Due to my resent absence as a result of technical difficulties, I have a bit of make-up-work to do. In the next few days, I will be posting a more in-depth post dealing specifically with this controversy.

1. Yes this comment addresses the new law requiring identification.
But here, I’d like to clear up a misconception. Your statement “dealing with people who “supposedly look like illegal immigrants”, is a misrepresentation of the facts.

Obama, the media and everybody on the left is misrepresenting the Arizona law. Kris Kobach, a professor and the primary author of the Arizona legislation said, “This law only kicks in when a police officer already has made a lawful contact with the person such as stopping him for breaking another law…”

Nobody in Arizona can be pulled over because of their race or because of the way they look. The cops can’t engage ’em unless they’ve got reason to on some other grounds, traffic stop or what have you, suspicion of robbery. They’re just lying about this.

They’re playing the race card here. “This is profiling, produce your papers,” they don’t want a substantive analysis of this at all, any part of that, because on the substance they lose. That’s why the template here is: this racism, this white supremacy, this Nazi-like tactics, why, this is going to launch Democrats to new heights of power in the November elections, and really motivate Obama’s base, really reenergize Democrat voters. It’s all BS.

When you or I get pulled over for speeding, or maybe a broken taillight, the officer ask for our “papers” (drivers license, registration, proof of insurance). If we board an Airplane, we are ask for our ‘papers’. When we use a credit card or write a check, once again we are ask for our ‘papers’.

Remember, it was just last summer that the Democrats in Congress made US citizens show their residency papers before they were allowed into the town hall meetings. Remember that? Not just a resident of the US, you had to be a resident of that congressional district. And they were claiming it was a matter of national security to even allow them into the building.

I’ll even expand on this further in a future post. But, I think, I’ve made my position a bit clearer for our discussion here.

2.” the ppl of Arizona want something more extreme than this?”
Actually A Rasmussen Reports poll found that almost two-thirds — 64 percent — of voters in the state favored the measure. The poll I quoted was a national poll. Reflecting the strong national support for this law. I do not believe “extreme” would apply. I believe that the majority of the nation supports enforcing the laws already on the books, of which most dealing with illegal immigration are ignored. And, due to the lack of federal responsibility to enforce these laws, states are left to pick-up the slack.

3. Yes, I agree. I believe the laws already on the books, need to be enforced. Our society is based on the ‘rule of law.” If the Federal Government refuses to step up to its constitutional responsibilities, the states then must respond. If the states do not respond, it is the right of citizens to defend themselves. This is the basis of a Republic form of government.

If you have any additional questions, let me know. I will follow up with a post dealing specifically with the AZ law soon. I will include this response within that post.

Debate is greatly encouraged and appreciated here. All opinions are welcome.

Thank you for participating in this discussion. Please come back often.

Phantom Lady