I couldn’t agree more with the positions put forward in this video. Please pass this on.

Felonious Munk speaks ‘truth to power’. Straight forward, passionate and truthful!! What more can you ask for?

AMEN BROTHER!
God bless you and keep up the good work.

Gallon of gas, $3.70

Royal Dutch/Shell oil exploration costs,  $1.5 Billion.

The actual truth from a Democrat, PRICELESS.

Just a reminder… nothing has changed.

FEMA 2010 Federal Disaster Declarations

Daily Reveille > News
Oil spill: worst environmental disaster in US history

Black blobs washing on sandy beaches, brown pelicans grounded with oil-covered feathers and fishermen looking for work have become common sights in national media since the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded off the Louisiana coast 50 days ago, spewing millions of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.

That’s right, 50 days and no mention of the Gulf oil spill.

Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, Florida… soon the East Coast, the American economy, the current administration, where are these?? They all rank up there with the worst disasters in American history.

Simple, factual, and the glaring truth of the matter;

June, 8 2010, Obama Presidency – declared a NATIONAL DISASTER.

God, help us all…

CALDERON:

You will notice that the violence in Mexico started to grow a couple of hours before I took office in 2006. This coincides, at least, with the lifting of the assault weapons ban in 2004. I will ask Congress to help us, with respect, and to understand how important it is for us that you enforce current laws to stem the supply of these weapons to criminals and consider restating the assault weapons ban.

Here he is blaming Bush. He’s blaming all this stuff on his predator just as Obama does, and says he wants us to enforce current law. But, no, he doesn’t want us to enforce current law. He doesn’t want us to enforce the current federal immigration law. He doesn’t want us to enforce Arizona’s immigration law.

But he wants us to enforce an assault weapons ban. So he comes here…

Here Felipe Calderon blasting the United States and lecturing Arizona to thunderous applause from Democrats, a standing Ovation…

CALDERON:

I strongly disagree with your recently adopted law in Arizona.

It is a law that not only ignores a reality that cannot be erased by decree, but also introduced a terrible idea: Using rashal — racial profiling as a basis for law enforcement. And that’s why I agree… I agree with president to say the new law carries a great amount of risk when core values that we don’t care about are breached.

Ripping our country to a standing ovation of the Democrat Party.

What does he care about racial profiling? There is no racial profiling in the bill. This is just so purposely taken out of context.

“I agree with the president who says the new law carries a great amount of risk.”

Whose “core values“?

He comes here and disses our immigration law, blames the United States for all the guns in Mexico.

I guess now it’s a human right to cross the US border. So these guys come in and Calderon says they’re getting guns here. They’re coming to America and picking up assault rifles in their quest for a better life. The drug gangs down in Mexico are beheading people left and right, and it’s interesting to point out they have legalized drugs in Mexico. They have legalized everything — the hard stuff, the soft stuff.

Calderon was on with Wolf Blitzer Wednesday night on CNN Situation Room.

BLITZER:

What’s wrong with the folks in Arizona wanting to protect their border?

CALDERON:

In Arizona, there is some racial profiling criteria in order to enforce the law that it’s against any sense of human rights; and, of course, is provoking very disappointing, uh, things — or very disappointing opinion — in Mexico and around the world, even here in America. So to introduce this kind of elements, especially racial profiling aspect that are attempting against what we consider human rights, it’s the principle of discrimination which is against the values of this great nation.

Who is he to preach to us? For crying out loud, they deport more illegal immigrants from Mexico than we do!

How do they catch their illegal immigrants? Do they profile them? How the hell do they find out who’s in their country illegally?

BLITZER:

So if people want to come from Guatemala or Honduras or El Salvador or Nicaragua, they want to just come into Mexico, can they just walk in?

CALDERON:

No! They need to fulfill, uh, a form. They need to establish their right name. We analyze if they have not a criminal precedence.

BLITZER:

Do Mexican police go around asking for papers of people they suspect are illegal immigrants?

CALDERON:

Of course! Of course!

BLITZER:

If somebody sneaks in from Nicaragua or some other country in Central America through the southern border of Mexico and they wind up in Mexico, they can going get a job?

CALDERON:

No, no, no.

BLITZER:

They can work?

CALDERON:

If somebody do that without permissions, we send — we send back them.

Not everybody in this country is a liberal.

There are a lot of Americans here who are gonna look at this and say,

“This guy is just an idiot.”

Answering those questions like that from Blitzer, he has no right from now on to say anything to us about our immigration law. People can’t even get a job in Mexico unless they have “per-meee-sion…and if they do that, do that, we send ’em back.”

How do they find out who they are in the first place? You think they have to profile ’em?

“We analyze them.”

They’re very, very strict. You can’t own property, you can’t get involved in politics if you are an immigrant, legally in Mexico. It’s very restrictive. And he comes here and lectures us with the approval of the president of the United States and the Democrats in the House of Representatives, who gave it a standing Ovation.

He comes here to lecture us about the way we are trying to enforce our own immigration law.

We got a foreign leader coming here and what’s on his teleprompter’s been written by whoever writes Obama’s words. But then when he’s off the prompter and gets the question about Mexico’s own law, we get the truth.

Here is the main Mexico immigration law:

Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society: * Foreigners are admitted into Mexico ‘according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress.’ (Article 32)

Immigration officials must ‘ensure’ that ‘immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance’ and for their dependents. (Article 34)

Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets ‘the equilibrium of the national demographics,’ when foreigners are deemed detrimental to ‘economic or national interests,’ when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when ‘they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.’ (Article 37)”

All of those are reasons you can be barred from going into Mexico.

The Secretary of Governance may ‘suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest.’ (Article 38)

Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:* Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)

A National Population Registry keeps track of ‘every single individual who comprises the population of the country,’ and verifies each individual’s identity. (Articles 85 and 86)”

I could keep going…

A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).

Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:* Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)*

In one week we have had this administration side with the Chinese against their own country and bring in the president of Mexico as a prop to mouth Obama’s words to a joint session of Congress beating up on the state of Arizona and the people who are there and the people who live there.

What’s happening here is a doubling down of playing the race card. The president of the United States is continuing to divide this country while pretending to be this great unifier.

In one week, Michael Posner at the State Department tells the ChiComs…

(paraphrased)

“Yeah, we really have no business lecturing you because you’re right: We have some terrible problems in our own country right there in Arizona. That immigration law is very, very bad for human rights.”

So for the first time in my life, agents of a communist government (China) come to our country and criticize us, and our administration agrees.

And for the first time in my life a foreign president (ostensibly an ally) comes here to rip the sovereign state of Arizona, the sovereign United States and its laws — using language exactly like the president of the United States — and the Democrat members of Congress give him a standing ovation.

Meanwhile…

Mexicans are…

“taking the law into their own hands…

“Cops are being killed by the drug cartels just like in Arizona. In the meantime, Felipe Calderon admits, “Oh, yes, of course we check people’s papers. We find out if they are worth being here. If they get a job and they have lied, they get sent home.”

All the while he’s telling us that we’re discriminating and violating our core values.

Want to know what happened to reciprocity? It’s called liberalism.

You want to know what happened to prosperity? It’s called liberalism.

You want to know what happened to economic opportunity and freedom? It’s called liberalism.

There’s a giant disconnect: Liberalism from Americanism.

It’s the plain, simple truth, for everybody to see.

It’s really no surprise to see Obama stand with Señor Wences against Arizona and the vast majority of people in the United States. Is there any issue today — terrorism, health care, cap and trade, taxes, spending — where Obama stands with the majority of the American public? No.

people sponsoring amnesty are not even concerned about these people liking the country. They’re not even concerned about them understanding the country. They aren’t even concerned about them becoming real citizens. All they want is their votes.

In fact the more economically challenged they remain, the poorer they remain, and as uneducated as they can be, the more dependent they will be.

He’s clearly in need of these Hispanic votes. He’s going to need ’em in 2012 because he’s lost half the country. If he hasn’t quite lost half the country, he’s on the way to losing half the country. He knows it.

Harry Reid is gonna need Hispanic votes if he has a prayer of saving his seat in Nevada in November.

We know there’s not going to be an amnesty bill before the election. But there’s going to be a lot of talk about it, and they’re hoping that the talk will encourage Hispanics to go ahead and vote.

“The Democrats really care. They want us to have amnesty. They’re going to get it done. They can’t get it done now.”

They’re hoping that will inspire support and votes, which is all this is about.

HOLDER:

“I have not had a chance to — I’ve glanced at it,”

Holder said at a House Judiciary Committee hearing when asked had he read the state law cracking down on illegal immigrants.
Fox News: May 13, 2010

Sen. John McCain on Monday asked Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, a former Arizona governor, if she’d had a chance to review Arizona’s controversial immigration law.

NAPOLITANO:

“I have not reviewed it in detail,”

Napolitano said during a hearing of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

“I certainly know of it, senator.”

She knows of it…  Really??

Who doesn’t, “know of it” ?  Actually reading it… those pesky little details can be such a burden.

Sound familiar??   (added to WTF list…)

PELOSI:

“But we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy.”

CONYERS:

I love these members that get up and say, “Read the bill!” What good is reading the bill if it’s a thousand pages and you don’t have two days and two lawyers to find out what it means after you’ve read the bill?

Back to the misrepresentation, of the unread bill…

OBAMA:

[E]fforts in Arizona which threaten to undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans, as well as the trust between police and their communities that is so crucial to keeping us safe.  In fact, I’ve instructed members of my administration to closely monitor the situation and examine the civil rights and other implications of this legislation.

The president is bashing Arizona for simply trying to enforce the law — the federal law, as well as now a new state law.

Has he read the law??

Simple question. Isn’t protecting our legal citizens from an invading army of illegal aliens who are using our services and taking our jobs, a basic notion of fairness?

Why is fairness being denied to American citizens?  What about the basic fairness of state and federal governments to protect the American citizens?

Looks like what’s going on in Arizona is an effort to criminalize enforcing the law.

Related Post: Obama CliffsNotes… updated
Related Post comment:

Comment by Gage:

glad you posted something new for me to read while i’m in web design ;] all very well until the last bullet that confused me:

•Governor Jan Brewer signed an immigration law that launched a national debate.
Obama and his regime govern against the will of the people. CBS Poll: 60 percent of Americans say Arizona’s tough new immigration law is “about right” or “doesn’t go far enough.” Are you listening, Washington?

1. is this dealing with the thing where people who “supposively look like illegal immigrants” must carry a form of identification with them at all times and must present it when requested to do so by a cop?

2. the ppl of Arizona want something more extreme than this?

3. do you agree or disagree with this idea?

thanks ;*,

Gage

In this comment I am actually beginning the conversation about the new Law passed in Arizona. Due to my resent absence as a result of technical difficulties, I have a bit of make-up-work to do. In the next few days, I will be posting a more in-depth post dealing specifically with this controversy. (Above Post)

1. Yes this comment addresses the new law requiring identification.

But here, I’d like to clear up a misconception. Your statement “dealing with people who “supposedly look like illegal immigrants”, is a misrepresentation of the facts.

Obama, the media and everybody on the left is misrepresenting the Arizona law. Kris Kobach, a professor and the primary author of the Arizona legislation said…

“This law only kicks in when a police officer already has made a lawful contact with the person such as stopping him for breaking another law…”

Nobody in Arizona can be pulled over because of their race or because of the way they look. The cops can’t engage ’em unless they’ve got reason to on some other grounds, traffic stop, suspicion of robbery or what have you.

They’re just lying about this. They’re playing the race card here.

“This is profiling, produce your papers,” they don’t want a substantive analysis of this at all, any part of that, because on the substance they lose.

That’s why the template here is: this racism, this white supremacy, this Nazi-like tactics, why, this is going to launch Democrats to new heights of power in the November elections, and really motivate Obama’s base, really reenergize Democrat voters.

It’s all BS.

When, you or I get pulled over for speeding, or maybe a broken taillight, the officer ask for our “papers” (drivers license, registration, proof of insurance). If we board an Airplane, we are ask for our ‘papers’. When we use a credit card or write a check, once again we are ask for our ‘papers’.

Remember, it was just last summer that the Democrats in Congress made US citizens show their residency papers before they were allowed into the town hall meetings. Remember that?

Not just a resident of the US, you had to be a resident of that congressional district. And they were claiming it was a matter of national security to even allow them into the building.

I’ll even expand on this further in a future post. But, I think, I’ve made my position a bit clearer for our discussion here. (Refer to above information)

2.” the ppl of Arizona want something more extreme than this?”

Actually A Rasmussen Reports poll found that almost two-thirds — 64 percent — of voters in the state favored the measure. The poll I quoted was a national poll. Reflecting the strong national support for this law. I do not believe “extreme” would apply. I believe that the majority of the nation supports enforcing the laws already on the books, of which most dealing with illegal immigration are ignored. And, due to the lack of federal responsibility to enforce these laws, states are left to pick-up the slack.

Addendum:

Rasmussen Reports, May 12 2010:

“A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey shows that just 17% oppose the proposal to prevent illegal immigrants from gaining access to public housing, unemployment benefits, welfare or workers compensation.”

“Seventy percent (70%) of Massachusetts voters favor a proposal recently rejected by the state legislature that would stop illegal immigrants from receiving public benefits.”

“The proposal failed to pass in the Democratically-controlled State House last month by a 75 to 82 vote.”

So once again the Democrats are governing against the will of the people. Nothing new to this administration.

3. Yes, I agree.

I believe, the laws already on the books need to be enforced.

Our society is based on the ‘rule of law.”

If the Federal Government refuses to step up to its constitutional responsibilities, the states then must respond. If the states do not respond, it is the right of citizens to defend themselves. This is the basis of a Republic form of government.

…

Arizona Governor Brewer Sends Obama Sing-A-Long: Read Immigration Law!