Unity.

It isn’t going to happen…

These people, they’re liberal Democrats, and when the rubber meets the road, they hate Republicans, even if they’re McCain.

Folks, you wait, if McCain ends up being the nominee, you’re going to see the Media and the Democrat opposition research people releasing stuff about this guy that’s being held back now because they want him to be the nominee.

If you think that this unity business is going to take place, you do not know the left in this country.

Did Eisenhower get unity? No.

Did Nixon get unity? No.

Reagan get unity? No.

Bush 41 get unity? No.

Bush 43 get unity? No.

Did Kennedy get unity? No.

Did LBJ get unity? No.

When the country is at war, the anti-war crowd is going to perk up, and a lot of them are in the media.

But one other thing that I would like to ask those of you who are military — and you know of my profound, deep respect and awe for you, but I would like to ask you about McCain’s support for closing Guantanamo. — Senator McCain wants to shut down Guantanamo Bay because of abuses that the Europeans are accusing us of committing, and so he wants to appease the Europeans and whoever the hell else around the world who thinks that we are committing torture.

These are the people with whom we are at war. We have gleaned operational intelligence from people at Guantanamo. Waterboarding gave us everything we needed to know about the 9/11 mastermind and hijackings and the plans and operations of it. Waterboarding, not torture.

The attorney general was put on the spot in hearings and he told the guys at the committee, screw you — he didn’t use those words.

He didn’t back down. Waterboarding is not torture. I’m not going to tie my government’s hands. He said, (paraphrasing) “I would love to institute my personal preferences on these kind of things, gentlemen, but I am the attorney general of the United States, and my first duty is the defense and protection of the Constitution here. I am not going to just by fiat tie my country’s hands dealing with this enemy.”

Senator McCain wants to do that.

He wants to bring these prisoners of war into the United States, give them constitutional rights and lawyers, and basically fight the war in the court system.

So on the one hand Senator McCain sounds all gung-ho, I’m for the surge and this sort of thing, but if you look at some of the other things that he’s trying to do, like cut down on the interrogations that take place. I mean, isn’t that part of the war, the internal security of the country?

We were attacked here on 9/11, after all. I don’t think we need to close Guantanamo.

Senator McCain says that if we waterboard these clowns we’re no better than our enemy. What do the troops think of that?

I’m just throwing some questions out there, not trying to agitate, not trying to stir the pot.

Just throwing some questions out there.

You know, my friends, I’ve always told you there’s another agenda behind the global warming hoax — and that’s socialism.

Global warming-ism is an anti-capitalist ideology, rooted in the idea that America is too successful, too prosperous; that our prosperity must be curbed because it’s supposedly harming the planet.

Well, our former President Bill Clinton confirmed everything. Campaigning for his wife out in Denver, Clinton proclaimed: “Everybody knows that global warming is real.” And he went on to declare that America and other “rich countries” should say: “Okay, we just have to slow down our economy and cut back our greenhouse gas emissions ’cause we have to save the planet for our grandchildren. We could do that.”

Yes, my friends: America should “slow down our economy” — go into a recession! — to serve a myth perpetuated by radical environmentalist with an anti-American, anti-capitalist worldview.

Now, this former President — and candidate for another Clinton co-presidency — has just suggested we deliberately hamper our economic standing in the world and cripple our economy for the sake of appeasing an unproven, scientifically flawed theory that has no basis in fact.

If we were to do what Bill Clinton suggests, millions of Americans would never be able to exercise their potential to prosper. It’s a sabotage of the American Dream, a sabotage of America itself — which would no longer be the superpower it is now, and all of us would have to turn to government for more and more.

This kind of thinking is as dangerous. And it better open your eyes to what the Clinton mindset — the liberal mindset — really is.

Resource:
ABC News: Bill — “We Just Have to Slow Down Our Economy” to Fight Global Warming

Something ugly happened this week here in California’s liberal-dominated legislature: Governor Schwarzenegger’s health-care overhaul — negotiated with Democrats, successfully passed the state assembly — could not muster enough votes to get out of a key Senate committee.

This was a breakthrough plan, at a discount price. Why, for a mere 15 billion dollars — a mere pittance — 70 percent of California’s uninsured population (over 5 million people) could have had instant free health care!

Sure, government mandates would have increased; businesses, hospitals, and smokers would have faced higher taxes. But California was in a position to once again lead the way, to show the rest of America how to deliver socialized medicine to the masses.

With so much at stake, with the dream so close to being realized, why — how — couldliberal senators kill it? Democrat Sheila Kuehl, who headed the Committee, says: “It doesn’t matter if there are all these good things in the bill, if there’s not sufficient funding to pay for them.”

That’s it? That’s the excuse?

No money? This bill, which would have given hope and free health care to millions, was killed over… money? Minorities and the poor are now going to be hardest hit — again — because a few heartless, mean-spirited, shortsighted California legislators don’t want to spend the money?

When has that ever stopped them, folks?

AP: Calif. Senate Panel Blocks Health Push

Exit polling data from Florida; See if you can spot a trend here, folks.

Questions

“On most political matters, do you consider yourself liberal?” Romney, 24% of his supporters said yes, and 49% of McCain’s voters said they consider themselves liberal.

“On most political matters, do you consider yourself moderate?” Twenty-one percent of Romney voters said yes, and 43% of McCain’s voters said yes.

“On most political matters, do you consider yourself conservative?” Thirty-seven percent of Romney’s supporters did, 29% of McCain’s.

So, independents, liberals, a vast majority for McCain.

There’s the Reagan coalition for you there, folks.

Here’s the headline:

“‘Rudy Defeat Marks End of 9/11 Politics’ — Rudy Giuliani’s distant third-place finish in Florida may put an end to his bid for president, and it seems also to mark the beginning of the end of a period in Republican politics that began on Sept. 11, 2001. Giuliani’s national celebrity was based on his steady, comforting appearance in Americans’ living rooms amid the terrorist attacks, and his campaign for president never found a message beyond that moment. The emotional connection he forged that day, it seems, has proved politically worthless. After months of wonder that the former mayor seemed to have no ceiling to his support, he turned out to have no floor, trading fourth-place finishes with Ron Paul, a little-known Texas congressman. ‘There’s a paradox for Rudy,’ said former Nebraska Sen. Bob Kerry, who was a member of the 9/11 Commission. ‘One of the things he did very well on 9/11 was say, “We’ve got to get back to normal.” And that’s what’s happened. We’ve gotten back to normal.'”

So 9/11’s over.

It’s over, folks, and libs have won on that, 9/11’s over; no reason to talk about it; no reason to have any concern about it; certainly no reason to use it in politics.

Look what happened to Rudy. See, this is the left successfully trying to get us to stop talking about a security issue, because they know that they are weak on it. So success in battle and at home has brought on a lack of interest, the Media says, about 9/11.

I would suggest to you it’s just the opposite.

I would suggest if you look at the exit returns down in Florida, most of the elderly vote went for McCain, a lot of the military vote went for McCain, and there are two reasons for it.

One is this notion that he’s the only guy that can beat Hillary, and the other is he’s constantly talking about national security where the other candidates appeared to be weak on it.

I frankly think that it’s a mistake for any Republican voter to think that any Republican candidate doesn’t care about national security. The Democrats you should have that concern about, but just because McCain was the only one talking about it prominently, does anybody doubt that Rudy, or Fred Thompson even, or Romney would not respond accordingly if there were another 9/11 type attack? We’ve only got one candidate in our midst that we can trust to do the right thing? Bull crap…

Politico: Rudy Defeat Marks End of 9/11 Politics