I don’t want to go through O.J. again and I don’t want to go through the Clintons again.

Bottom Line…

I just don’t.

This is incredible from CNN. This headline: “Clinton Unveils Mandatory Health Care Insurance Plan.”They’ve been trying to hide that aspect of it. Do you know what the name of her health plan is? It’s the “American Health Choices Plan.” The name of her health care plan is American Health Choices Plan. CNN brought this up, and properly characterizes it as “mandatory.”

Did you hear what Hillary said? Hillary, on September 3rd, went over and talked to the AARP legislative conference, the American Association for Retired Persons.

She said, “When I’m president, privatization is off the table. It is not the answer to anything.”

By the way, Hugo Chavez has said much the same thing about the schools. Hugo Chavez is going to take over the public schools over there because you can’t let the private sector just run away with things.

So here’s Mrs. Clinton: mandatory socialism in the schools; mandatory health care in the country.

Source reference links below:

Clinton unvveils mandatory health care insurance plan
Chavez Threatens to Take Over Schools

During the testimony from General Petraeus, not one Democrat asked…

‘What can we do to help you, the troops, and the war effort?’

... they keep refering to there patriotism and how they support our troops.

Makes you think… does’t it?

Bush skunked ’em and it kills ’em.

Thur. night on Hardball with Chris Matthews, he said, “Did Bush give you any indication how many troops he would use to support the commitment as he described to you today?”

RUSSERT: No. But Chris, to give you a sense of his mindset, when he is asked to talk about common ground — “I want to find common ground with the Democrats in Congress” — and asked what that means, the response is: accepting the Petraeus report.

MATTHEWS: So that’s the common ground?

RUSSERT: That’s how he views this.

MATTHEWS: Wow.

They think he’s deranged. They are two different worldviews here. Yeah, common ground is accepting the report. Wow. That’s common ground? They asked for the report! They demanded the damn report, folks. The Democrats in Congress demanded the damn report.

By the way, folks, I want to remind every one of you, including you Democrats, when the president announced the war on terror, he said it would go beyond his presidency. Wouldn’t it be wise for you Democrats to be looking at inheriting this war as an opportunity, rather than an albatross around your neck? Yeah, but you don’t see anything positive in anything, so why am I asking?

If I’m wrong on this… I’d love to know what they see, as going well…
Economy, War, Gas, Environment, etc… — anything…

Still waiting …

Journalists’ Credibility Ratings Lower Than Bush’s

Too little too late, Democrats say of US troop reduction in Iraq

By the way, from the “mine is bigger than yours“ department, the United States just said that it’s got bigger bombs than what the Ruskies just lit off the other day. “The U.S. has a 14-ton super bomb more destructive than the vacuum bomb just tested by Russia, a U.S. general said Wednesday.” This is “retired Lt. General McInerney, chairman of the Iran Policy Committee, and former Assistant Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force. McInerney said the U.S. has ‘a new massive ordnance penetrator…'” That’s a bomb.

“McInerney said the U.S. has ‘a new massive ordnance penetrator that’s 30,000 pounds, that really penetrates … Ahmadinejad has nothing in Iran that we can’t penetrate.’ He also said the new Russian bomb was not a ‘penetrator.'” Also, the Russians said, “Don’t worry, our bomb will not destroy the environment. Our bomb will not harm the environment,” as they showed videotape of apartment buildings and tanks being blown to smithereens and a giant fire consuming the forest where they set the bomb off.

U.S. develops 14-ton super bomb, bigger than Russian vacuum bomb

^^ Resource Link ^^

From Davenport, Iowa: “Former US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright,” in my mind another incompetent failure, “said that Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton is the best presidential candidate to repair America’s image. She also said Clinton is a caring friend. Albright, speaking at an event in Davenport on Thursday, said the Bush administration has caused many problems, but Clinton could restore America’s reputation.”

Right. Repair the nation’s image? I think, folks, this depends on what image one would want to project.

If you want to project the image of a broken, cowering, collapsing nation sinking rapidly toward Third World status, then Hillary is your girl — or man, whatever Elizabeth Edwards said she is. But if the image is a nation that’s prosperous, self-assured, battle-ready to defend ourselves, not be shaken by frivolous events or fad theories of impending doom, then I think we have to look elsewhere for a president than under Madeleine Albright’s skirt.

By the way, is that the primary job of a president, to “repair the nation’s image”? Is that what we’re to do? We want a PR department running the United States of America, folks?

Albright Says Clinton Will Repair Nation’s Image
Former Secretary Of State Calls War ‘Major Disaster’

^ RESOURCE LINK