Frustrated Incorporated
I just want something simple, like the TRUTH!

The Democrats are still beside themselves over President Bush in Israel at the Knesset saying that Barack Obama — well, the Democrats are saying he was talking about Obama. The White House has denied that.

This is the president yesterday in Jerusalem at the Knesset.

THE PRESIDENT:

Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along. We’ve heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared, “Lord, if I could only have talked to Hitler, all this might have been avoided.” We have an obligation to call this what it is: the false comfort of appeasement which has been repeatedly discredited by history.
(applause)

Side note: Do you notice that Democrats are always offended by HISTORY? It just seems to me that, as Bush explained historical facts in his speech, the democrats, as illustrated below, twist and turn history to their political whim. They have made an art out of re-writing history.

You know, folks, one of the interesting things about this is that in a personal sense, Obama was not even charged. He’s out there defending himself for something he hasn’t even been accused of. Furthermore, all these people that are rising up in righteous anger over what the president said ostensibly about Obama are not denying that Obama said this, because he did say it.

They’re not denying he said it. They’re simply saying, “It’s untenable. It’s horrible. It’s un-American. It is outrageous to attack from foreign soil! Politics ends at the water’s edge!” I listen to these people, and I want to pull my hair out.

For the past five years they’ve been going all over the world, from Al Gore to Bill Clinton, and denouncing our Iraq strategy and trying to secure defeat. The Democrats in Washington, both House and the Senate, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi have been proclaiming defeat and all of this. And they act like this is some huge effrontery?

These are the people who laud Jimmy Carter — these are the people who laud Al Gore and Bill Clinton — when they go abroad, when they are on foreign soil, and they attack their own country. All of a sudden now they’re back to “politics stops at the water’s edge,” in anticipation of what they think will be a coming Obama administration that they want to shield from any sort of criticism at all.

CHRIS DODD: When presidents are out of country, people avoid attacking the president.

JAMIE RUBIN: The most ugly form of American politics brought to another shore.

NANCY PELOSI: You know, we have a protocol, that we don’t criticize the president when he is on foreign soil.

BILL RICHARDSON: Bad form in criticizing a presidential candidate on foreign soil.

HAROLD FORD: You don’t attack presidential candidates or presidents on foreign soil.

SUSAN RICE: A deliberate attack by the president on foreign soil.

ROBERT GIBBS: An unprecedented political attack on foreign soil.

JOHN EDWARDS: The president of the United States should not engaged [sic] in this kind of politics outside the shores of the United States. It’s just not right!

I know what you’re all thinking, “How in the world can the media report this without ripping into these people?”

These are the people that have been doing this very thing ever since George Bush assumed office in 2001, and here they’re acting like they are as innocent and clean and pure as the wind-driven snow; this is some great offense that’s taken place and you are watching all this and you’re listening to all these Democrats, and you’re screaming, because you can’t believe it.

The media is facilitating all this. This is a great lesson for you, which I think most of you probably learned by now already. The Media and the Democrats are accomplices. They are in league together — and they, they have no doubt what their agenda is, and they have no compunction whatsoever about advancing it — and they don’t care what we think of them. They couldn’t care less

They are advancing an agenda. The media simply amplifies it and passes it along, and we sit here and say, “Where the hell is somebody standing up and pointing this out?”

Barack Obama, conducting a town meeting in Watertown, South Dakota, he’s up there with Tom Daschle and he is criticizing…

“John McCain and President Bush for ‘dishonest and divisive’ attacks in hinting that the Democratic presidential candidate would appease terrorists. Obama strongly responded Friday to the comments Bush made in Israel on Thursday and McCain’s subsequent words. Obama told a town hall meeting, ‘That’s the kind of hypocrisy that we’ve been seeing in our foreign policy, the kind of fear-peddling, fearmongering that has prevented us from actually making us safer.’ Obama said McCain had a ‘naive and irresponsible belief that tough talk from Washington will somehow cause Iran to give up it’s nuclear program and support for terrorism.’

Nancy Pelosi, in Washington was asked by an unidentified reporter,

“You mentioned your trip to Israel. I’m wondering if you had any reaction today to the president’s speech in the Knesset, what he said there about appeasement and so forth.”

PELOSI: You know, we have a protocol, sort of a custom informally around here that we don’t criticize the president when he is on foreign soil. One would think that that would apply to the president, that he would not criticize Americans when he is on foreign soil. I think what the president did in that regard is beneath the dignity of the office of president and unworthy of our representation at that observance in Israel.

Of course no mention of her trip to Syria. No mention of her effort to undermine US foreign policy while on foreign soil, and no reference to the fact that Bush is in Israel, 60th anniversary of the Jewish state. He could have been talking about Neville Chamberlain. He was talking about appeasing Hitler! And yet these people are so defensive, and they know he’s right! They had to announce this, they had to have their little fit to try to distract the criticism, because anything, a divisive attack on liberals equals the truth.

Here’s Obama, on February in Austin, Texas at a presidential debate.

OBAMA: I would meet without preconditions, although Senator Clinton is right that there has to be preparation. It is very important for us to make sure that there was an agenda and on that agenda was human rights, releasing of political prisoners, opening up the press, and that preparation might take some time, but I do think that it’s important for the United States not just to talk to its friends but also to talk to its enemies.

He would meet without preconditions. He said it. These are his own words. This is why they’re having this fit. This is why they’re going nuts, because he said it.

What Bush said reminds everybody what Obama’s foreign policy is going to be…

Leave a Reply